Post 5nppWceZiBd

ܤܡܝ ܦܠܕܢܝܘܤ Jun 10, 2018 (14:43)

Though both are listed as Middle Quenya forms at Eldamo, is the verb lah- from LAKH possibly a later/newer item than manka- from MBAKH (in the Etymologies)?

Since lah- appears on pages 102-103, someone like myself who doesn't have a copy of PE22 can get the impression that it would be, after reading +

Paul Strack Jun 10, 2018 (14:52)

LAKH is from Quenya Verbal Structures written in the 1940s, whereas MBAKH is from the Etymologies from the 1930s

Ицхак Пензев Jun 10, 2018 (15:00)

But they have different meanings, don't they?

Tamas Ferencz Jun 10, 2018 (15:42)

+Ицхак Пензев Sami may want to figure out why the two roots have the same form and yet the verbs differ

ܤܡܝ ܦܠܕܢܝܘܤ Jun 10, 2018 (16:21)

+Paul Strack Thank you.