G+ LoME Archive
[
All
] [
Tags
] [
Search
]
[
Menue
]
Post
Jvwuv8kfpCb
← previous
Александр Запрягаев
,
ܤܡܝ ܦܠܕܢܝܘܤ
,
Ицхак Пензев
,
Lőrinczi Gábor
,
Tamas Ferencz
,
WordWheel
next →
Tamas Ferencz
May 25, 2016 (16:06)
Looking for simple ways to express the following adverbs in Q (or S, for that matter):
at all
(al)though
at least
Александр Запрягаев
May 25, 2016 (17:01)
I started with checking how Helge uses those in his Bible rendering. He has
ómu
as attested for 'though' (PE15:032), a bit of a stretch for me. Anyway, there it is an obvious parallel of
óma
above, long obsoleted.
Lőrinczi Gábor
May 25, 2016 (18:56)
I would cheat a little bit. E.g.:
Ú-eiphin sui cae yrch anglennar i annon.
At least (=
not less than
) ten orcs are approaching the gate.
Ú-velin i negyth, uin, ach hain ú-fuion.
I don't like the dwarves at all (=
I do not, as an emphasis
), although (=
but
) I don't hate them either.
Александр Запрягаев
May 25, 2016 (18:57)
For 'at least', the temptation is strong to just use
ambela
.
Tamas Ferencz
May 25, 2016 (19:03)
+
Александр Запрягаев
I confess I don't see how it would fit. If aught, I could see it used as 'moreover'.
EDIT: I have pondered it, and I think I understand your logic. 'beyond one = more than one = at least one".
Tamas Ferencz
May 25, 2016 (19:07)
+
Lőrinczi Gábor
would you elaborate on
ú-eiphin
, pls?
Tamas Ferencz
May 25, 2016 (19:10)
For 'at all' perhaps one can use
aqua
before the negative particle.
Aqua lá melinyel.
'I completely don't love you = don't love you at all.'
Lőrinczi Gábor
May 25, 2016 (19:13)
+
Tamas Ferencz
It's
an-
+
pîn
(from
Cûl Bîn
"Little Load"), cf.
einior
("older").
Tamas Ferencz
May 25, 2016 (19:16)
+
Lőrinczi Gábor
cheers
Tamas Ferencz
May 25, 2016 (19:17)
Thinking about an adjective
*ampenya
"most lacking => least"
ܤܡܝ ܦܠܕܢܝܘܤ
May 25, 2016 (20:35)
arpitya/arpia lestaSSË/NEN
when talking about amounts?
Tamas Ferencz
May 26, 2016 (11:47)
+
Александр Запрягаев
thinking even further,
ambela
wouldn't fit after all, as "at least one" is x>=1, while
ambela mine
is x>1, right?
Ицхак Пензев
May 29, 2016 (08:06)
At first I read
at last
, not
at least
and thought that this was easy:
telmas(së)
. But 'at least' indeed may be rendered as
arpitya lestanen
.
Tamas Ferencz
May 29, 2016 (10:52)
+
Ицхак Пензев
AFAIK "at last" is attested as
yallume
Ицхак Пензев
May 30, 2016 (08:32)
+
Tamas Ferencz
námalya téra. Mauya nin parë i quettaparma ambë.
Tamas Ferencz
May 30, 2016 (09:36)
+
Ицхак Пензев
nemis nin aurion yurasta lá faren kese illi parmar yo pare illi quettar!
Ицхак Пензев
Jun 01, 2016 (11:46)
+
Tamas Ferencz
ananta páranyet ter loaron otso! ;)
Александр Запрягаев May 25, 2016 (17:01)
Lőrinczi Gábor May 25, 2016 (18:56)
Ú-eiphin sui cae yrch anglennar i annon.
At least (= not less than) ten orcs are approaching the gate.
Ú-velin i negyth, uin, ach hain ú-fuion.
I don't like the dwarves at all (= I do not, as an emphasis), although (= but) I don't hate them either.
Александр Запрягаев May 25, 2016 (18:57)
Tamas Ferencz May 25, 2016 (19:03)
I confess I don't see how it would fit. If aught, I could see it used as 'moreover'.
EDIT: I have pondered it, and I think I understand your logic. 'beyond one = more than one = at least one".
Tamas Ferencz May 25, 2016 (19:07)
would you elaborate on ú-eiphin, pls?
Tamas Ferencz May 25, 2016 (19:10)
Lőrinczi Gábor May 25, 2016 (19:13)
Tamas Ferencz May 25, 2016 (19:16)
cheers
Tamas Ferencz May 25, 2016 (19:17)
ܤܡܝ ܦܠܕܢܝܘܤ May 25, 2016 (20:35)
Tamas Ferencz May 26, 2016 (11:47)
thinking even further, ambela wouldn't fit after all, as "at least one" is x>=1, while ambela mine is x>1, right?
Ицхак Пензев May 29, 2016 (08:06)
Tamas Ferencz May 29, 2016 (10:52)
Ицхак Пензев May 30, 2016 (08:32)
Tamas Ferencz May 30, 2016 (09:36)
Ицхак Пензев Jun 01, 2016 (11:46)