+Ицхак Пензев
Yitzik, your latest post and list of words has inspired me to start something similar (and I do not want to hijack your dictionary or anything, I will still contribute to that, or the two be combined or whatever), so I have searched the net for the list of the 1000 most common words of the English language and created a wordlist out of it. Let's see to how many of them we can assign a NeoQuenya equivalent!
The document is linked below and is editable. Please feel free to share it in the FB chat page so that others can contribute if they are up for it.
This would also provide an opportunity for some interesting statistics, to see what percentage of the 1000 has an attested (or readily derivable) equivalent, i.e. how "modern" or "relevant" the attested vocabulary is.
UPDATE
The link below now points to the new, spreadsheet version of the document. Please add your contributions to this one - I have disabled sharing on the old version.
Thank you +Robert Reynolds and +Severin Zahler for the conversion!
Everyone Please use the spreadsheet version to make your contributions, not the old .doc version - use the link in this updated post. +Andre Polykanine +Łukasz Szkołuda
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ExGnWkCLT4dXYGZX3UOjd75uST5H2cnsZE_Dm3be_Tc/edit#gid=0
Tamas Ferencz Dec 31, 2017 (11:50)
Ицхак Пензев Dec 31, 2017 (11:58)
Александр Запрягаев Dec 31, 2017 (15:14)
Ицхак Пензев Dec 31, 2017 (15:26)
Tamas Ferencz Dec 31, 2017 (15:49)
Tamas Ferencz Dec 31, 2017 (15:49)
Tamas Ferencz Dec 31, 2017 (15:52)
Leonard W. Dec 31, 2017 (16:27)
Tamas Ferencz Dec 31, 2017 (16:37)
Robert Reynolds Dec 31, 2017 (17:06)
Robert Reynolds Dec 31, 2017 (17:51)
Tamas Ferencz Dec 31, 2017 (18:07)
Robert Reynolds Dec 31, 2017 (18:16)
Severin Zahler Jan 01, 2018 (01:52)
Robert Reynolds Jan 01, 2018 (02:05)
Ицхак Пензев Jan 01, 2018 (13:54)
I'm curious as to who determined this "hierarchy of methods" and on what principles it is based. It seems to me like it would lead to some rather paradoxical results.
Tamas Ferencz Jan 01, 2018 (15:00)
Ицхак Пензев Jan 01, 2018 (17:10)
ܤܡܝ ܦܠܕܢܝܘܤ Jan 01, 2018 (21:18)
Tamas Ferencz Jan 02, 2018 (09:46)
Tamas Ferencz Jan 02, 2018 (11:41)
Robert Reynolds Jan 06, 2018 (18:28)
Robert Reynolds Jan 17, 2018 (16:40)
Tamas Ferencz Jan 17, 2018 (17:03)
Tamas Ferencz Jan 22, 2018 (16:47)
ܤܡܝ ܦܠܕܢܝܘܤ Jan 28, 2018 (19:03)
Tamas Ferencz Jan 28, 2018 (23:44)
Robert Reynolds Mar 08, 2018 (15:02)
Tamas Ferencz Mar 08, 2018 (15:18)
Robert Reynolds Mar 22, 2018 (14:47)
Tamas Ferencz Mar 22, 2018 (15:23)
Robert Reynolds Mar 31, 2018 (13:35)
Tamas Ferencz Mar 31, 2018 (13:46)
Robert Reynolds Mar 31, 2018 (14:01)
Tamas Ferencz May 11, 2018 (18:45)
Robert Reynolds May 21, 2018 (14:23)
Tamas Ferencz May 21, 2018 (15:06)
Perhaps now we could start taking the untranslated words one by one and see if we can come up with good neologisms for them.
Robert Reynolds May 22, 2018 (14:32)
Tamas Ferencz May 22, 2018 (14:35)
Robert Reynolds May 22, 2018 (14:36)
Leonard W. May 28, 2018 (08:50)
Great job everyone!
Tamas Ferencz May 31, 2018 (13:52)
Damien Bador Jun 18, 2018 (13:04)
It's only in the case where the earlier word has been clearly rejected, superseded by a new meaning or a new derivation that I would agree to derivation being better.
We have too many examples of Tolkien picking a very old invention of his in a very late text to discard straight away the old Qenya words. And we have also many examples of Tolkien stating that a specific root has no derivative in a specific language, and giving similar exceptions to regular derivation rules to restrict neologisms to the very strict minimum. I don't like double-guessing Tolkien, unless I really have no other choice.
Tamas Ferencz Jun 18, 2018 (19:08)
Damien Bador Jun 18, 2018 (21:24)
However, I wouldn't necessarily put Early Qenya words behind such inventions. It would be a case-by-case basis, depending on the likelihood of the earlier words to be still valid within Tolkien's later conception.
Tamas Ferencz Jun 18, 2018 (21:29)