I'd like to ask your opinion on some info found in here (https://realelvish.net/pronunciation/sindarin/).
As far as I know, LH/HL is more like voiceless alveolar lateral approximants[l̥] than voiceless alveolar lateral fricatives[ɬ] (Welsh ll).
The latter is found in words like mallorn though.
http://www.elvish.org/Tengwestie/articles/Hostetter/sindll.phtml
And the recorded RH/HR sound has so much air or H sound that it sounds like two separate consonants. It should be simple trilled R without vibrating vocal cords in my opinion.
Tamas Ferencz Mar 16, 2018 (09:40)
Fiona Jallings Mar 16, 2018 (19:41)
For the HR/RH parts - which set are you referring to? There's mine which use /ʀ/ and my roommate's which use /r̥/. He's not a linguist or an Elvish-enthusiast, so he had a lot of difficulty producing the sound.
Young P Mar 17, 2018 (17:51)
My focus was not on LL from LTH. I'm saying "(LH) Pronounce it /ɬ/" this part seems not correct because Tolkien said in the Appendix that "L represents more or less the sound of English initial L, as in let. . . . LH represents this sound when voiceless (usually derived from initial sl-)." 'S' in 'sl-' is voiceless so it affects 'L' making it voiceless. If L is VOICED alveolar lateral APPROXIMANTS, LH should be VOICELESS alveolar lateral APPROXIMANTS/l̥/ not voiceless alveolar lateral fricatives/ɬ/ which is Welsh LL and sounds more or less similar to /ʃ/.
Though, I admit I'm not a linguist and not familar with /l̥/ sound. I'm not 100% sure about my argument but just want give some help, if possible, to your already wonderful work.
Fiona Jallings Mar 17, 2018 (19:34)
As for the LH, I picked up the habit from Hiswelókë.
Young P Mar 18, 2018 (03:49)
I don't want to be rude but if you teach people your habit you picked giving nothing to what's wrong and right, I'd say it's not right at all.
Fiona Jallings Mar 18, 2018 (04:42)