Well, no one could accuse you of not being thorough, +Damien Bador :) (BTW is *terkara a good neologism for "thorough"?)
I will certainly look through the list.

I wanted to add, your scoring system is really interesting and a great idea.

*alata-: would the later varya- fit the sense you were looking for?

*apaita-: not sure what more does this provide as compared with tur- or perhaps *ortur- (cf. S. orthor-)?

*ítarata feels weird on my tongue, can't tell why

what's the idea behind akar- "complete, accomplish"?

not sure if *moinwa is a valid word phonetically in Quenya?

+Tamas Ferencz I admit the combination oinw isn't attested, but I can't find any attestation of diphthong reduction before consonantic groups, so I expect that oi wouldn' change. (Unfortunately, Tolkien didn't detail very much the topic of diphthongs in Q.)

Regarding nw, there are examples of changes to nu, but only after consonantic groups, which isn't the case here.

So I'm not sure what change could apply here, and I tend to think that it must be valid. What would you have expected?

+Tamas Ferencz *ítarata is probably too long to feel like a right Q. word. Also, arata is already an exception to the Q. syncope, which adds to the "weirdness" felt.

I must admit I wasn't entirely satisfied with this one. Hence, following your remark, I've changed it to *ítarta, which is hopefully better. Don't hesitate to tell me your opinion.

+Tamas Ferencz Yes, of course varya- fill well the meaning expected for alata-, but the point is that I need here a synonym to reflect the synonymy in the original.

I've used varya- elsewhere, and I try to avoid any under-translation that would blur vocabulary variations in these poems.

+Tamas Ferencz For apaita-, I also needed a synonym to avoid re-using tur-. Besides, in this case, I had to put the stress on conquering rather than dominating or mastering. Hence my choice.

However, I must admit I missed the C.E. ortur-, which has quite the right meaning and is much more compatible with the later Q. vocabulary. I'll do the change right away.

+Damien Bador how about *ítaráta with a lengthening to change the stress pattern?

+Damien Bador I think the perfective form of moia- would be moianwa like alanwa from ala-

+Tamas Ferencz Regarding *acar-, I must admit this isn't as simple a case as my grading puts it.

For me, the prefix a- appearing for some verbs in Markirya (e.g. ahosta) could actually denote completion (or incompletion, depending on your reading), rather than infinitive: I don't believe in a prefixed infinitive, as it runs contrary to all other examples and explanations on Q. infinitive.

Yet, I must admit that without further data on this topic, this is too tentative an explanation to stand in a translation.

Hence, I've changed this verb to *tercar-, thanks to your "thorough" neologism suggestion and to the well-established example of mar- / termar-. I hope you will find this an improvement.

Concerning "lend, loan", perhaps in Quenya that would not be a single word but a phrase like lehta/sene lúmenna quenen "(re)lease for a time to someone"

+Damien Bador concerning the a- prefix see this thread from a few weeks ago: https://plus.google.com/u/0/111421808258109658290/posts/T12tYHCd5dW

+Tamas Ferencz So you'd prefer ítaráta to *ítarta?

+Tamas Ferencz For moia-, I considered it a "ā-verb" rather than a "half-strong", due to the inherently "continuous" nature of the activity. The rule in that case called for suppressing the ā- ending (cf. PE 22, p. 116).

Yet is it true this verb comes from mōja-, and we could consider it to be a "half-strong". This has the advantage of removing the phonological issue. I adopt your idea.

+Tamas Ferencz On what ground should be consider that lending money was unknown to Númenórians, if not to the Elves? After all, Tolkien developed quite a few Qenya words for "peddlar", "hawking goods" and the like, which point toward a truly commercial society, at least in Middle-earth.

In such a context (not to mention the context of the Psalmic redaction, heavily influenced by Mesopotamian and Phoenician societies), having a periphrastic rendering of such a basic verb as "loan" seems cumbersome. An unpractical in poetry, in any case.

Still, I readily admit that there could be better solutions than my own on this matter, but I would insist on a single (maybe compounded) verb, not an entire sentence.

+Tamas Ferencz Thanks for the link. Very interesting discussion. The mediopassive voice seems an explanation fitting well all attested examples of a- verbs.

This confirms it was necessary to change *acar-.

+Damien Bador my arguments are similar to your we just got a different conclusion. I agree that 'lend' would be a basic verb in Q (not in the verb-class sense but as a semantic entity); however, we don't know how Tolkien would've formed it (would it be related to a root meaning 'release'? 'loose'? 'yield'? 'give'? or something new?) so my thought was that for now it's safer to resort to a phrase instead of coming up with a compound.
Having said that, I am starting to warm to your *lúmelav-; after all, 'timeshare' is a thing in English.

+Tamas Ferencz I fully agree with you on the fact that Tolkien might have come up with a very different idea than mine, either from another attested root or from an entirely new one.

In fact, I would be really surprised if we were to learn that I was right. And that would be mostly luck.

Yet, I remain convinced that we cannot afford a periphrastic construction, especially in poetry. Which is why I attempted to create a word that would be understandable as a kenning, even if it weren't what Tolkien might have invented.

And of course, I intend to revise the whole Psalmic translation with each new publication, and I hope we'll end up getting attested words for most of my neologisms.

I see that you extrapolated *tyaila "sacrifice" from T. jagula. Looking at other derivates of the root DAGA it looks that they're mostly continuant with the later root NDAK, so perhaps "sacrifice" could be derived from it as well, using a similar form, like *nyahta- or *nyak-?

the above suggestion concerns the verb forms of course, not the noun

+Tamas Ferencz I don't really agree with your comment that other derivates from DAGA fit with derivates from later NDAK-: as far as I can tell, only Q. nahta is in this case. Yet your concern is right and raise an important point, as my derivation can't fit with root NDAK-. It would be a perfect fit for the phonological rules of Early Qenya, but no longer correct in the frame of the "Outline of Phonology".

From E.T. jagula and comparison with E.T. tagula (derived from E.Prim. dagla, we can complete and update the E.Prim. word dịag from which jagula is supposed to derive: it should be in fact. *dịag-la (or more precisely *dịag-lā). Hence, two possibilities: if we consider that the new root still is (N)DAK- (as in Etym.) rather than NDAK-, then the initial would become l- in Q. I'll avoid this option, as the later version of the root is always said to be NDAK-, with no Q. words that could be traced to an alternate *DAK-, as far as I can tell.

If we choose to stick with the later attestations of the root, the primitive word can only be *ndịak-lā. At this stage, we know that kl groups are changed, either by insertion of a vowel whose quality is the same as the previous vowel: this would give Q. *nyacal(a). In some (unspecified) cases, a metathesis can occur: this would give Q. *nyalca. I tend to prefer the later one for brevity reasons, but your advice would be appreciated, especially since this type of metathesis is said to be a non-systematic sound-change.

+Tamas Ferencz Your last comment is cryptic for me: as you label E.T. jagula a noun (and I tend to agree), I would have expected that your comments concerned the noun, not the verb (which I actually derive from the recontructed noun).

+Damien Bador what I meant was that under the "updated" root NDAK the Eldarin verb (and consequently the late Quenya verb) "to sacrifice" could have the same relationship to the Eldarin verb "to slay, kill" as under the early root DAGA. And yes indeed, the same applies to the noun as you have rightly pointed out.

I have now completed and fully revised my translation up to Ps. 41.

First, I'll reflect these additions to the online Wordlist, then I'll create new tabs to give the latest version of each Psalm, as revising text on Google+ isn't very convenient.

The wordlist is now fully updated up to Ps. 44.

Great progress, Damien.