G+ LoME Archive
Oct 01, 2017 (14:18)
A question to discuss. Do you believe that even in nominative Sindarin pronouns are unchangeably lenited?
Is there enough evidence to either side? I personally use them lenited for two reasons:
1) the unexplicable lenition in
, not really understandable as it would be a non-grammatical leninion of a subject by an adverb which are properly unconnected;
2) the introduction of
etc. under SE in the Etym, without even giving a possibility of an unmutated version.
In the same vein: how do you deal with the emphatic pronouns? Do you generalise
Oct 01, 2017 (19:17)
Won't PE23 contain material about pronouns amongst others? Maybe we'll know more when it comes out...
Oct 01, 2017 (19:20)
It won't: (a) we already got a lot from PE22 and it's radically different from the current state, (b) it will be irrelevant for Noldorin (the definitive grammar of 1948 Ñ is not planned to be in PE23).
Oct 01, 2017 (19:38)
ah, okay. At least you have insider information 😅