Given the entry SYAD- [Etym:389], perhaps the verb might also alternatively be derived from a CE single action noun *kjab–ta/–to. I'm unsure as to what the ultimate Sindarin result would be, though. (Morris-Jones' A Welsh Grammar § 93 tempered by VT47&48 = *–abt– > *–apt– >> ?)
+ܤܡܝ ܦܠܕܢܝܘܤ +ܤܡܝ ܦܠܕܢܝܘܤ +ܤܡܝ ܦܠܕܢܝܘܤ +ܤܡܝ ܦܠܕܢܝܘܤ It would have gone to aptha and then presumably remain as such (no attested, but cf. Ecthelion, Belecthor). However, with KYAW, which seems to be the final form of the stem, a basic ablauted caw < kauw < kjâw-a is suggested. Also kilme is not to be forgotten. cilf or rather cilith/cileth?
Tamas Ferencz Jan 22, 2016 (09:14)
Александр Запрягаев Jan 22, 2016 (12:06)
Tamas Ferencz Jan 22, 2016 (12:18)
touché. Forgot about that.
ܤܡܝ ܦܠܕܢܝܘܤ Jan 22, 2016 (19:57)
[No S cognate of Q tapta given in VT39:17?]
Александр Запрягаев Jan 22, 2016 (20:37)
It would have gone to aptha and then presumably remain as such (no attested, but cf. Ecthelion, Belecthor).
However, with KYAW, which seems to be the final form of the stem, a basic ablauted caw < kauw < kjâw-a is suggested. Also kilme is not to be forgotten. cilf or rather cilith/cileth?
Fiona Jallings Jan 22, 2016 (20:58)
Hjalmar Holm Jan 26, 2016 (13:39)