G+ LoME Archive
Jul 16, 2018 (17:47)
Handen sisnome epe *komputerinya as *hlarmar or hlarunya lastala liennar quete, quete, ar tá quete amba. Hlarunya nwalyat.
*hlarma "listening device, earphone, headphone"
Jul 16, 2018 (17:50)
Actually I am quite uncertain about the form
; as far as I know we don't have examples of u-duals with possessive suffixes, but my lambetyáve tells me the plural/dual marker should be the last; so should dthat be hlarunyat, with a duplication of the dual marker?
Jul 17, 2018 (03:35)
That's a very fair question. I agree that the dual inflection would typically go after possessive suffixes; using
as a connecting vowel for nonsingular is a possibility (as with
). Perhaps PE21 has the answer somewhere…
Jul 17, 2018 (08:22)
Maybe when there is a pronominal suffix present, the speakers just switch to the t-dual inflection. After all, "hands" are eminent candidates for an u-dual and yet we have
Jul 17, 2018 (09:02)
there are forms like
attested in PE21 which may point to the t-marker and u-marker coexisting in one word? Or we assume the marker reallocating to the end of the word after the pronominal suffix, like
. It's looking weird, but the above forms show they may not be unimaginable.
eldamo.org - Eldamo : Middle Quenya : nén
Aug 09, 2018 (01:17)
A really interesting question. I'd still go with forms like hlarunya, hendunya (with no dual marker reduplication). If we constructed something like máryat, what will be the connecting vowel? the most logical would be i, but for me **hlarinyat would sound rather awkward, as if it had a plural -i marker inside.
Aug 09, 2018 (08:56)
but wouldn't that be the case with normal plurals as well?